I know it's been a long time, but vacation was wonderful, and now I am re-energized to give strong life lessons to all my faithful readers that are sure to save many hours of confusion and/or harm.
Which, of course, leads us to an inspiring story out of Worcester, MA where Panara Bread Company sued Qdoba Mexican Grill over the definition of a Sandwich.
See, Panara had an exclusivity clause in its contract that it would be the only Sandwich dealer in a particular mall in Worcester. When the mall began talks with Qdoba, Panara's lawyers jumped into action claiming breach of contract because Burritos are Sandwichs as well.
After a long legal battle, and a judge citing such unique sources as a chef, a USDA official, and, of course, the dictionary. Judge Jeffrey Locke ruled what everyone of us already knew, Burritos, indeed, are not Sandwiches.
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I want to hear the reasoning they had for why a burrito IS a sandwich.
It was something along the lines of "Sandwiches are bread with fillings, tortilla is just bread of a different variety, thus, tortillas with fillings is a sandwich." I read it somewhere...
Post a Comment